SB responds to HKJA’s statement

December 30, 2022

The Security Bureau today expressed regret over a statement by the Hong Kong Journalists Association on a criminal case, and said its allegation that the verdict affects the freedom of the press is totally unfounded and misleading.

 

The bureau said that in Hong Kong, any arrest and prosecution is directed against the criminal act and has nothing to do with the political stance, background or occupation of the people concerned.

 

It would be totally contrary to the rule of law to suggest that a certain group of people could enjoy privileges and break the law without bearing legal responsibilities due to their capacity, it added.

 

As regards the criminal case the association referred to, the court with independent judicial power has found the person concerned guilty of "possession of offensive weapons in public place”.

 

This proves that the prosecution action was fully substantiated by facts and legal reasons. In fact, as the Judge of the District Court pointed out in his judgment, while that person claimed to be a journalist, there was indeed no need to carry forceps and laser pens within the scope of his duties, the bureau said.

 

The Security Bureau said the Government is firmly committed to safeguarding freedom of press and speech, which are protected under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights.

 

However, freedom of press and expression are not absolute, and may be restricted for reasons including the protection of public safety according to the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights. Journalists, like everyone else, have an obligation to abide by the law, the bureau added.

 

Anyone, regardless of their background or profession, should be held accountable for their illegal acts, adding that law breakers must be brought to justice, which have nothing to do with freedom of speech, press and publication.

 

Noting that no one can be above the law, the bureau said the Government will continue to handle all cases in a fair, just and impartial manner in accordance with the law.

Back to top