Font Size
Default Font Size Larger Font Size Largest Font Size RSS Subscription Advanced Search Sitemap Mobile/Accessible Version 繁體 简体
Photo

Family affair:  Permanent Secretary for Labour & Welfare Paul Tang launches the public consultation on the “joint parental responsibility model”.

Views sought on child custody

December 28, 2011
A public consultation has been launched to gauge views on the Law Reform Commission's recommendation the “joint parental responsibility model” be implemented by legislative means to replace the existing custody and access arrangements under family law.
 
Permanent Secretary for Labour & Welfare Paul Tang today said, under existing law, when parents divorce, the court rearranges their parental rights through custody orders.
 
“It may make a sole custody order, which gives the power to make important decisions about the child to only one of the parents, who is the custodial parent, or a joint custody order, which gives the power to both parents,” he said.
 
“In its Report on Child Custody & Access, the commission recommended these existing arrangements be abolished and replaced by the joint parental responsibility model.”
 
The report said the joint parental responsibility model is a new approach to dealing with the arrangements for children after their parents divorce. It emphasises the continuing responsibilities of both parents toward their children rather than their parental rights. Both parents will retain their responsibilities to participate in important decisions about their children even after divorcing.
 
Some major recommendations made by the commission to introduce the model into family law include specifying in the law some major decisions affecting the child require the express consent of both parents, while some require notification to the other parent.
 
It also recommends abolishing the custody order and access order currently provided for under the law and replace them with the “residence order” and “contact order”. The non-resident parent will still retain parental responsibility over the child and the right to be involved in important decisions affecting its well-being and future.


Other suggestions include introducing a “specific issues order” and a “prohibited steps order”, which enable the court to give direction to address disagreements between parents on issues relating to their children.
 
Mr Tang said the Labour & Welfare Bureau has convened informal meetings with stakeholders to gauge their views on the recommendations.
 
“Some stakeholders shared the commission’s view the joint parental responsibility model should be implemented by legislative means as it could promote the continued involvement of both parents in the upbringing of the child, which is in the best interests of the child,” he said.
 
“Some, however, were concerned the recommendations might provide opportunity to hostile parents to obstruct and harass the other spouse after divorce.
 
“In view of the views expressed and since the recommendations, if implemented, would have a far-reaching impact on children and families, we consider it advisable and prudent to launch a consultation to gauge more fully the views of the public before mapping out the way forward.”
 
Click here for the consultation paper. Written views should reach the bureau by post to Team 1, 11/F West Wing, Central Government Offices, 2 Tim Mei Avenue, Tamar, Hong Kong, by fax to 2524 7635 or by email by April 30.


Top
Prevention of Avian Influenza